Difference between revisions of "Linear vs logarithmic scales"
From SoundDB
(Created page with " Human hearing is better measured on a logarithmic scale than a linear scale. On a linear scale, a change between two values is perceived on the basis of the difference be...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | *Human hearing is better measured on a logarithmic scale than a linear scale. | |
| − | + | *On a linear scale, a change between two values is perceived on the basis of the difference between the values. Thus, for example, a change from 1 to 2 would be perceived as the same amount of increase as from 4 to 5. | |
| − | + | *On a logarithmic scale, a change between two values is perceived on the basis of the ratio of the two values. That is, a change from 1 to 2 (ratio of 1:2) would be perceived as the same amount of increase as a change from 4 to 8 (also a ratio of 1:2). | |
[[File:img7.png]] | [[File:img7.png]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
[[File:digitalAudio.pdf]] | [[File:digitalAudio.pdf]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:17, 16 February 2011
- Human hearing is better measured on a logarithmic scale than a linear scale.
- On a linear scale, a change between two values is perceived on the basis of the difference between the values. Thus, for example, a change from 1 to 2 would be perceived as the same amount of increase as from 4 to 5.
- On a logarithmic scale, a change between two values is perceived on the basis of the ratio of the two values. That is, a change from 1 to 2 (ratio of 1:2) would be perceived as the same amount of increase as a change from 4 to 8 (also a ratio of 1:2).
